Showing posts with label architecture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label architecture. Show all posts

Saturday, 16 October 2010

Day 43 through 61 of 365 Catchup.

Day 61 of 365: White beer



Day 60 of 365: Lightning bolt



Day 59 of 365: The hat that keeps you going



Day 58 of 365: Chandelier



Day 57 of 365: The little details



Day 56 of 365: Manmade landscape



Day 55 of 365: No almonds here!



Day 54 of 365: Poor, ugly, grumpy



Day 53 of 365: Green bay



Day 52 of 365: Johnny 5 is alive!



Day 51 of 365: Red arrow



Day 50 of 365: Hopper



Day 49 of 365: Room with a view



Day 48 of 365: Crawl space



Day 47 of 365: View through



Day 46 of 365: Flow



Day 45 of 365: House on the hill



Day 44 of 365: No stopping



Day 43 of 365: Coffee and nut cake

Monday, 6 September 2010

Day 22 of 365:
Angel of Darkness

A little urban exploration after dark this evening brought me to this site.

I'm interested in exploring the limits of the stills camera, in particular the limits of exposure, and spaces like this are perfect for making interesting, aesthetically pleasing photographs. I'm considering making a series of similar images exploring spaces where light and dark collide.

The execution is fairly simple- just take a light reading of the area you want to expose for (in this instance the area of brickwork directly below the light source), set your camera to Manual and dial in your settings. Compose and shoot. You might want to bracket one stop either side too.

Thursday, 2 September 2010

What am I?

Tell someone you're a photographer or get into a discussion about photography and fairly soon the question "What do you shoot?" is going to come up. On the surface, not really that tough a question, but actually, I'm not sure anymore.

A few years ago, my shooting was all for me, and that meant photographing things that I'm most comfortable with. For me that's always been urban landscapes- I love anything to do with the built environment, and spending time seeking out new angles and spaces to shoot would keep me contented for a long while. Although I still love spaces like these, looking back over what my photography has become in the past two years, it's clear that I don't just photograph one thing any more.

A semi-conscious desire to develop my general photographic skills coupled with pieces of work I've been asked to make has changed me to the point where if someone asks me what I shoot, I start to struggle. Usually the answer harks back to what I love- built up areas, but to be brutally honest, this doesn't hold true anymore. The fact is that I've grown to a point where I probably don't have a specific subject that I photograph.

So what am I? I spent a fair amount of yesterday thinking about this (four hours in a car makes your brain go a bit nuts), and in the end, I decided to look back at some images I've made in the last six months. The result was surprising. Traditional landscapes, products, abstracts, vehicles, portraits, architecture. Of everything I looked at, only about a fifth could be considered urban landscape, with the majority being images that were made to allow me to develop as a photographer. Even stranger is that of those urban landscapes, most are spaces I was put into rather than spaces I looked for.

In everything I shoot, I try to maintain a certain aesthetic, and my photographs certainly seem to have a look regardless of what I shoot. Subject has become less important, but stylistics remain. I don't think that is necessarily bad, far from it in fact- being able to turn your hand to a lot of different subjects makes you a stronger photographer, but I do feel a little sad that I no longer have "a thing". Urban spaces are still very close to my heart and I suppose if I could spend my time shooting just one thing it would probably be these, but the truth is that I now want to shoot different things.

So, next time someone asks me what I shoot, I know the answer. Oh wait... no I don't.